The Dark Side of Electric Vehicles: Mining, Ethical Dilemmas, and Canada's Energy Future

June 14, 2024

In recent years, the push towards a greener, more sustainable future has led to a dramatic increase in the production and adoption of electric vehicles (EVs). While EVs promise a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and a move away from fossil fuels, the journey to this utopian vision is marred by significant ethical, environmental, and logistical challenges. At the heart of this issue lies the dark and often overlooked world of mining for critical minerals like cobalt, lithium, and nickel, essential components of EV batteries. The situation in countries like the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) paints a grim picture of child labor, hazardous working conditions, and environmental degradation, raising questions about the true cost of our green aspirations.

The Ethical and Environmental Quagmire

Imagine children and adults armed only with rudimentary tools and bare hands, toiling under challenging conditions to extract cobalt. This is not a scene from a dystopian novel but a harsh reality in the DRC, home to some of the world's largest cobalt reserves. The cobalt mined here ends up in every lithium-ion rechargeable battery, powering our smartphones, laptops, and, most crucially, our EVs. The mining process is fraught with dangers, from frequent accidents and exposure to toxic substances to the exploitation of vulnerable populations. This raises a poignant ethical dilemma: Is the green energy revolution genuinely green, built on the back of such suffering?

The environmental impact is equally alarming. Mining for EV battery materials involves significant land disruption, water contamination, and biodiversity loss. Lithium extraction, for instance, requires vast amounts of water, often leading to the depletion of local water sources and adverse effects on surrounding ecosystems. As the demand for EVs skyrockets, these environmental concerns are set to escalate, posing a severe threat to the very planet we are trying to save.


Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and Geopolitical Risks

The EV battery supply chain's heavy reliance on critical minerals concentrated in specific regions creates substantial risks. This dependency makes the supply chain vulnerable to disruptions caused by geopolitical tensions, trade restrictions, and localized conflicts. Such disruptions can halt production, increase costs, and slow the transition to renewable energy. Additionally, the environmental impact is exacerbated by the low recycling rates of EV batteries, leading to significant waste and pollution. Discarded batteries contribute to landfill overflow and toxic leaks, further damaging ecosystems and human health. These issues highlight the broader implications of mineral mining and the urgent need for sustainable practices in the EV industry. Addressing these challenges requires robust international agreements, improved mining practices, and a commitment to ethical sourcing.

Balancing Act: EV Scale-Up and Mining Impact

Scaling up EV production while managing the environmental impact of mining requires a delicate balancing act. The surging demand for EVs places immense pressure on mining activities, exacerbating the ecological footprint. The extraction processes often lead to habitat destruction, soil erosion, and water contamination, creating a scenario where the benefits of EVs are overshadowed by the destructive practices needed to sustain their production. To mitigate these impacts, several strategies must be implemented. Improving recycling rates for EV batteries is critical to reducing waste and conserving resources. Developing alternative battery technologies that use more abundant and less harmful materials can lessen the reliance on environmentally destructive mining practices. Enhancing international cooperation is essential to ensuring a sustainable and ethical supply chain. Countries must work together to establish regulations that promote responsible mining, enforce labor rights, and protect the environment.

Canada's Role and Challenges

With its ambitious goal of achieving a net-zero grid by 2035, Canada finds itself at the crossroads of this global challenge. The NDP and Liberal parties have championed policies aimed at phasing out internal combustion engines and promoting EVs. However, where the necessary minerals will come from looms large. Despite Canada's rich mineral resources, the country faces significant hurdles in bringing new mining projects from concept to production. Bureaucratic red tape, environmental regulations, and lengthy approval processes mean that starting a new mine can take 10 to 25 years.

This sluggish pace is compounded by inadequate infrastructure. Canada's electrical grid, though diverse, lacks sufficient interties—crucial infrastructure needed to connect provincial grids and ensure a stable supply of electricity across the country. Without these interties, achieving a fully integrated and reliable grid remains a distant dream. The current government's failure to address these foundational issues casts doubt on the feasibility of their 2035 target.

Moreover, the regions most reliant on traditional energy sources, such as Saskatchewan, Alberta, and Atlantic Canada, will likely bear the brunt of the transition. These areas, which have already invested heavily in oil and gas industries, face economic disruption and job losses, exacerbating regional disparities and fueling discontent.

The Conservative Perspective

In stark contrast, the Conservative Party advocates for a balanced approach, accelerating the development of traditional oil and gas projects and green technologies. This dual strategy aims to create jobs, stimulate economic growth, and reduce Canada's dependence on foreign sources of critical minerals. By increasing domestic production, Canada can mitigate the ethical issues associated with overseas mining and enhance its energy security.

The Conservatives argue that relying on child and slave labor in other countries to meet green energy goals is both morally reprehensible and strategically flawed. They call for a pragmatic energy policy that prioritizes Canadian resources, ensuring that the benefits of the green revolution are shared more equitably and sustainably.

GoldCare's Commitment to Sustainability and Ethics

The moral and ethical consequences of the current energy policies are profound. We must maintain sight of our choices' human and environmental costs as we strive for a greener future. Policymakers must address these challenges head-on, crafting strategies that balance the need for sustainability with ethical considerations and economic realities.

At GoldCare, we are committed to promoting sustainable and ethical practices in all aspects of our business. Proper health and well-being extend beyond individual care to encompass our planet's and society's well-being. As we navigate the complexities of the energy transition, let us strive for solutions that uphold our values and ensure a brighter, more equitable future for all.


"Video: Truth About Electric Vehicles" - Makismd. Available at:

"EV Battery Supply Chain Vulnerabilities" - Nature Communications. Available at:

"Environmental Impact of EV Batteries" - GreenCars. Available at:

"Do Electric Cars Have a Problem With Mining for Minerals?" - The Guardian. Available at:

"Tricky Balancing Act Between EV Scale-Up and Mining Battery Metals" - Mongabay. Available at:

"The Challenges of Mining for Electric Vehicle Batteries" - Northwestern Engineering. Available at:

Dive Deeper into Healthcare Revolution